← Search

Lisa Harmon

— year-end
89 matches · 49W–40L · seasons 2021–2026

Captains: add Lisa Harmon to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history89 matches
L
2026-09-08 · RCC Samuels/Stivers · #4 Doubles · 4.0 · with Jane Kauder
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 0-6
W
2026-09-01 · RCC Samuels/Stivers · #4 Doubles · 4.0 · with Jane Kauder
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 3-6, 1-0
W
2026-08-18 · RCC Samuels/Stivers · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Sally Caldwell
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-3
L
2026-08-14 · #3 Doubles · with Kerry Torres championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 5-7
L
2026-08-07 · Raintree Evans · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Kelly Smith
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 1-6
W
2026-07-27 · Raintree Evans · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Catherine Fallin
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-1
W
Karen Grimes / Kathryn Williams
2026-07-20 · Raintree Evans · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Lorraine McGehee
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-1
W
Lori Davis / Susan Long
2026-07-14 · 9 RCC-Samuels/Stivers · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Lara Green
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-1
W
2026-07-13 · Raintree Evans · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Lorraine McGehee
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 7-5
W
2026-06-29 · Raintree Evans · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Shannon Webb
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 6-1
W
2026-06-25 · 9 RCC-Samuels/Stivers · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Irina Schaffernoth
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-1
L
2026-06-22 · Raintree Evans · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Catherine Fallin
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 1-6
Teams25 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level5 levels played
3.5
52.2%
12W–11L · 51.7% of games
4.0
47.1%
8W–9L · 45.8% of games
7.0
75%
24W–8L · 61.2% of games
8.0
0%
0W–4L · 42.3% of games
7.0mixed
0W–2L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 49% of the time
#1 Doubles
49%
44 matches
#2 Doubles
29%
26 matches
#3 Doubles
19%
17 matches
#4 Doubles
2%
2 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

It’s one of the reasons why I like tennis so much. Because you have to figure it out on your own.
Roger Federer