← Search

Timea Harisova

— year-end
78 matches · 51W–27L · seasons 2022–2026

Captains: add Timea Harisova to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history78 matches
W
2026-09-12 · MAC Gault · #3 Doubles · 6.5 · with Kayci McLeod
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 7-5
W
2026-08-31 · MAC Scott · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Michelle Jepson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 1-6, 1-0
L
2026-08-29 · MAC Gault · #2 Doubles · 6.5 · with Maria Gault
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 0-6
W
2026-08-24 · MAC Scott · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Deirdre Vaughan
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 7-5, 1-0
L
2026-08-23 · MAC Gault · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Sarah Bennett
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 1-6, 0-1
L
2026-08-17 · MAC Gault · #2 Doubles · 6.5 · with Nevena Skoro
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 7-6, 0-1
L
2026-08-09 · MAC Gault · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Kristen Powers
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 2-6
L
2026-08-08 · MAC Gault · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with CONSTANCE MATTOX
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 2-6
W
2026-08-01 · MAC Gault · #2 Doubles · 6.5 · with Kristen Powers
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-4
L
2026-07-27 · MAC Scott · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Michelle Jepson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 5-7, 0-1
W
N/A
2026-07-20 · MAC Scott · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Deirdre Vaughan
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-0
L
2026-07-15 · 16 Southampton Crews · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with CONSTANCE MATTOX
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 3-6
Teams38 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level11 levels played
3.0
80%
12W–3L · 61.6% of games
3.5
66.7%
8W–4L · 56.2% of games
6.0
40%
2W–3L · 49.5% of games
6.5
36.4%
4W–7L · 46.3% of games
7.0
100%
5W–0L · 64.8% of games
3.0mixed
1W–0L
not enough matches yet
5.5mixed
3W–0L
not enough matches yet
6.0mixed
80%
4W–1L · 56.8% of games
6.5mixed
1W–0L
not enough matches yet
7.0mixed
70%
7W–3L · 55.7% of games
7.5mixed
44.4%
4W–5L · 45.3% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 32% of the time
#1 Doubles
32%
25 matches
#2 Doubles
32%
25 matches
#3 Doubles
22%
17 matches
#1 Singles
10%
8 matches
#2 Singles
4%
3 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You have to believe in the long term plan you have but you need the short term goals to motivate and inspire you.
Roger Federer