← Search

Suzy Brown

— year-end
100 matches · 62W–38L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Suzy Brown to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history100 matches
W
N/A
2026-06-05 · THolwager (Life Time) · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Christina Peterson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-0
L
2026-05-30 · #2 Doubles · with Angie Lowe championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 1-6
W
2026-05-29 · #2 Doubles · with Angie Lowe championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-3
W
Marti Bowker / Kathy Lynch
2026-05-28 · #2 Doubles · with Cynthia Frasier championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 7-6
L
2026-05-18 · #3 Doubles · with Nadine Neel championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 2-6
W
2026-04-25 · DMiller/Williams (Charlotte Tennis) · #1 Doubles · 9.0 · with Mary Peterson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-4
W
2026-04-18 · DMiller/Williams (Charlotte Tennis) · #3 Doubles · 9.0 · with Becky Tennyson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-1
W
2026-04-11 · DMiller/Williams (Charlotte Tennis) · #1 Doubles · 9.0 · with Dorothy Cato
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-2, 1-0
W
2026-04-08 · BTennyson (Queens) · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with Nadine Neel
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-1
W
2026-03-21 · DMiller/Williams (Charlotte Tennis) · #2 Doubles · 9.0 · with Dorothy Cato
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-2, 1-0
W
2026-03-18 · BTennyson (Queens) · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with Jennifer Sopel
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-4
L
2026-03-04 · BTennyson (Queens) · #3 Doubles · 4.5 · with Cynthia Frasier
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 3-6, 1-0
Teams20 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level7 levels played
0.0
100%
4W–0L · 63.8% of games
4.5
79.4%
27W–7L · 61.3% of games
5.0
25%
1W–3L · 35.6% of games
8.5
40%
8W–12L · 49% of games
9.0
72.7%
8W–3L · 55.8% of games
8.0mixed
50%
5W–5L · 56.5% of games
9.0mixed
1W–2L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 48% of the time
#1 Doubles
48%
48 matches
#2 Doubles
26%
26 matches
#3 Doubles
26%
26 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You always want to win. That is why you play tennis, because you love the sport and try to be the best you can.
Roger Federer