← Search

Geraldine Klauber

Cary, NC
4.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
245 matches · 152W–93L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Geraldine Klauber to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history245 matches
W
2026-09-09 · TOC.Otsuka · #2 Doubles · 8.5 · with Julie Rogers
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-0
W
2026-08-20 · TOC.Allara · #2 Doubles · 8.5 · with Madelie Brand
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 6-4, 1-0
L
2026-08-17 · TOC.Otsuka · #2 Doubles · 8.5 · with Ellen Libby
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 6-4, 0-1
L
2026-08-11 · #1 Doubles · with Ayako Otsuka championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 2-6, 0-1
L
2026-08-06 · TOC.Allara · #1 Doubles · 8.5 · with Madelie Brand
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 5-7
W
N/A
2026-07-16 · NMAC.Efsen · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Jette Efsen
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-0
L
2026-07-14 · TOC.Rogers · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Ayako Otsuka
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-4, 0-1
W
2026-06-11 · NMAC.Efsen · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Jette Efsen
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-4
L
2026-06-09 · TOC.Rogers · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Ayako Otsuka
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 4-6
W
2026-05-30 · #2 Doubles · with Nancy Lacross championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 6-1
W
Sara Naff Mlo / Joanne Carroll
2026-05-29 · #3 Doubles · with Nancy Lacross championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-4
W
N/A
2026-05-28 · NMAC.Efsen · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Jette Efsen
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-0
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams45 teams · 2020–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level10 levels played
0.0
100%
6W–0L · 63.9% of games
4.5
71%
66W–27L · 58.3% of games
8.0
85.7%
6W–1L · 66.4% of games
8.5
50%
7W–7L · 48.5% of games
9.0
60%
15W–10L · 52.8% of games
9.5
3W–0L
not enough matches yet
0.0mixed
16.7%
1W–5L · 41.2% of games
8.0mixed
50%
4W–4L · 52.1% of games
8.5mixed
1W–2L
not enough matches yet
9.0mixed
64.9%
24W–13L · 52% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 56% of the time
#1 Doubles
56%
136 matches
#2 Doubles
24%
58 matches
#3 Doubles
18%
44 matches
#1 Singles
2%
6 matches
#2 Singles
0%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Champions keep playing until they get it right.
Billie Jean King