← Search

Lynn Chambers

Charlotte, NC
4.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
194 matches · 117W–77L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Lynn Chambers to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history194 matches
W
2026-09-14 · LCSW-Swanson/Westport · #2 Doubles · 8.5 · with Janet Novak
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-3
W
2026-08-17 · LCSW-Swanson/Westport · #1 Doubles · 8.5 · with C E Swanson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-4
L
2026-08-10 · LCSW-Swanson/Westport · #3 Doubles · 8.5 · with Leila Riccardelli
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 2-6
L
2026-05-30 · #2 Doubles · with Britt Ruby championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 1-4
L
2026-05-29 · #2 Doubles · with Susan Uzarski championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 3-6
W
2026-05-28 · #2 Doubles · with Britt Ruby championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-2
L
2026-05-19 · #1 Doubles · with Sunny Bowers championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 3-6, 1-0
L
2026-05-18 · #1 Doubles · with Stacy Agar championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 5-7
W
2026-05-03 · LRDA-Dann/Westport 40+ 4.5 · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Britt Ruby
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-2
W
2026-04-28 · LMLE-Lewis/Denny/NMP 18+ 4.5 · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with Salem Kirven
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-1
W
2026-04-14 · LMLE-Lewis/Denny/NMP 18+ 4.5 · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Stacy Agar
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-1
W
2026-04-12 · LRDA-Dann/Westport 40+ 4.5 · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with Elizabeth Berley
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-1
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams33 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level7 levels played
0.0
1W–2L
not enough matches yet
4.5
66.7%
56W–28L · 57.7% of games
5.0
2W–1L
not enough matches yet
8.5
61.9%
13W–8L · 55% of games
9.0
58.3%
7W–5L · 58% of games
4.5mixed
1W–1L
not enough matches yet
9.0mixed
58.3%
7W–5L · 58.2% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 42% of the time
#1 Doubles
42%
82 matches
#2 Doubles
30%
58 matches
#3 Doubles
17%
33 matches
#2 Singles
6%
11 matches
#1 Singles
4%
8 matches
#4 Doubles
1%
2 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Experience is a big word. I think it comes with time, and I have that.
Serena Williams