← Search

Christine Becer

VIENNA, VA
4.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
464 matches · 275W–189L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Christine Becer to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history464 matches
L
2026-09-12 · Team 1 NOVA Crush · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Laura Smith
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 2-6
W
Vera Ryss / Smita Aguiar
2026-09-02 · Team 3 Serve Me A Double 7.5 · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Qiuxian Li
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-2
L
2026-07-26 · Net Assets · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Hoa Nguyen mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
0-6, 3-6
W
2026-07-19 · #3 Doubles · with Shannon Bayliss championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 7-6
L
Michelle Wycinsky / Lauren Palmer
2026-07-11 · #3 Doubles · with Grete Bravo championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 4-6
L
2026-07-11 · #2 Doubles · with Jessica Coleman championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 1-6
L
2026-06-10 · Team 3 Graces Aces · #3 Doubles · 4.5 · with Arakai Henryson-Gibbs
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 0-3
W
N/A
2026-06-07 · Team 3 Graces Aces · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with Kelly Blackborow
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-0
W
N/A
2026-06-06 · GPS · #2 Singles · 4.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-0
W
N/A
2026-06-04 · GPS · #2 Singles · 4.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-0
W
2026-05-30 · GPS · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with Elizabeth McCann
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-2
W
2026-05-17 · Team 3 Graces Aces · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Cindy Pham
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 2-3
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams122 teams · 2020–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level12 levels played
4.0
67.9%
19W–9L · 62.8% of games
4.5
61%
86W–55L · 56% of games
7.5
75%
9W–3L · 62.9% of games
8.5
69.7%
23W–10L · 57.8% of games
9.5
1W–2L
not enough matches yet
4.0mixed
2W–0L
not enough matches yet
4.5mixed
76.9%
10W–3L · 61.2% of games
7.5mixed
66.7%
8W–4L · 58.6% of games
8.0mixed
67.9%
38W–18L · 58% of games
8.5mixed
65.4%
17W–9L · 53.9% of games
9.0mixed
29.5%
18W–43L · 43.8% of games
9.5mixed
50%
2W–2L · 55.6% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 32% of the time
#1 Doubles
32%
149 matches
#2 Doubles
32%
146 matches
#3 Doubles
29%
134 matches
#1 Singles
4%
18 matches
#2 Singles
3%
12 matches
#3 Singles
1%
5 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Success is a journey, not a destination. The doing is often more important than the outcome.
Arthur Ashe