← Search

Sarah Monsheimer

Rockville, MD
4.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
130 matches · 47W–83L · seasons 2020–2026

Captains: add Sarah Monsheimer to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history130 matches
L
2026-09-05 · Team 1 NOVA Crush · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Kim Miller
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 2-6
L
2026-09-02 · Team 1 NOVA Crush · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Lauren Wallenhorst
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 3-4
W
2026-08-04 · Lim 4.5 Women · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Lora Bacanskas
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-2
L
2026-07-29 · Lim 4.5 Women · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Georgi Lavinder
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 5-5
W
2026-07-11 · Lim 4.5 Women · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Georgi Lavinder
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 4-6, 1-0
L
2026-06-18 · Lim 4.5 Women · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Samantha Gass
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 0-6
W
2026-06-10 · Team 2 The Ringers · #3 Doubles · 4.5 · with Lauren Wallenhorst
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 3-0
W
2026-05-08 · Team 2 The Ringers · #3 Doubles · 4.5 · with Lauren Wallenhorst
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-7
L
2026-04-19 · Williamson - MoCo 4.5 · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Elissa Lei
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 2-6
W
2026-04-11 · Williamson - MoCo 4.5 · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Wendy Heger
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-1
L
Aravind Krishna / Jennifer Lee
2026-03-29 · Yee · #2 Doubles · 9.0 · with Endre Esztergomi mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 2-6
L
2026-03-14 · Yee · #1 Doubles · 9.0 · with Johan Holmberg mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 2-6, 0-1
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams44 teams · 2020–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level8 levels played
4.5
52.8%
28W–25L · 52.5% of games
8.5
1W–1L
not enough matches yet
9.5
40%
2W–3L · 46.5% of games
0.0mixed
0%
0W–5L · 41.7% of games
10.0mixed
1W–2L
not enough matches yet
8.5mixed
16.7%
2W–10L · 36.3% of games
9.0mixed
26.8%
11W–30L · 42.8% of games
9.5mixed
1W–2L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 44% of the time
#1 Doubles
44%
57 matches
#2 Doubles
35%
45 matches
#3 Doubles
22%
28 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You always want to win. That is why you play tennis, because you love the sport and try to be the best you can.
Roger Federer