← Search

Emma Bond

Jackson, MS
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
100 matches · 84W–16L · seasons 2023–2026

Captains: add Emma Bond to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history100 matches
L
2026-09-10 · Bond, Emma · #3 Doubles · 6.5 · with Lauren Ridgway
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 5-7
L
2026-07-15 · Jackson/Byrd · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Adam Byrd mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
5-8
L
2026-07-15 · Jackson/Byrd · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Jordan Miller mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-8
W
2026-06-23 · Byrd, Adam · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Brad Youngblood mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 7-5
W
2026-06-18 · Medina, Christian · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with John Patton mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 7-5, 1-0
W
2026-06-16 · Byrd, Adam · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Chad Myers mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 7-6
W
2026-05-26 · Byrd, Adam · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Adam Byrd mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-2, 6-0
L
2026-05-14 · Medina, Christian · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Jay Irving mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 1-6
L
2026-05-07 · Medina, Christian · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Kenneth Miller mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
0-6, 6-2, 0-1
W
2026-05-03 · Byrd, Katherine · #2 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-3, 1-0
L
2026-04-09 · Byrd, Katherine · #1 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 6-3, 0-1
W
2026-03-19 · Byrd, Katherine · #2 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-1
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams32 teams · 2023–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level11 levels played
2.5
90%
9W–1L · 71.4% of games
3.0
85%
17W–3L · 65.1% of games
3.5
82.6%
19W–4L · 60.3% of games
5.5
66.7%
4W–2L · 61.6% of games
6.5
90%
9W–1L · 66.1% of games
7.5
3W–0L
not enough matches yet
2.5mixed
100%
4W–0L · 74.6% of games
3.0mixed
100%
4W–0L · 72.3% of games
3.5mixed
76.9%
10W–3L · 63.3% of games
4.0mixed
1W–2L
not enough matches yet
6.0mixed
100%
4W–0L · 67.1% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 38% of the time
#1 Doubles
38%
38 matches
#2 Doubles
25%
25 matches
#3 Doubles
18%
18 matches
#1 Singles
10%
10 matches
#2 Singles
8%
8 matches
#3 Singles
1%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Every match is a story with a beginning, a middle and an end, and you are writing it as you go.
Chris Evert