← Search

MacKenzie Carmody

— year-end
129 matches · 99W–30L · seasons 2023–2026

Captains: add MacKenzie Carmody to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history129 matches
W
2026-08-25 · Brewer, Elise · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Grace Nicaud Thompson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 3-6, 1-0
L
2026-08-19 · Carmody, MacKenzie · #1 Doubles · 8.5 · with Lisa Jeffcoat
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 2-6
W
2026-08-18 · Brewer, Elise · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Elizabeth Randall
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 6-1, 1-0
L
2026-08-05 · Carmody, MacKenzie · #2 Doubles · 8.5 · with Andria Nanney
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 5-7, 0-1
W
2026-07-09 · Carmody, MacKenzie · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Elise Brewer
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-4
W
2026-07-08 · Carmody, MacKenzie · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Andria Nanney
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 4-6, 1-0
W
2026-06-30 · Do, Jennifer · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Tan Do mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 6-2
L
2026-06-25 · Do, Jennifer · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Jonathan Sims mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
5-7, 3-6
L
2026-06-18 · Do, Jennifer · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Mitch Evans mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 7-5, 1-0
W
2026-06-17 · Carmody, MacKenzie · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Anna Miskelly
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 7-5, 1-0
W
2026-05-07 · Do, Jennifer · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Jonathan Sims mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-0, 2-6, 1-0
W
2026-04-13 · Ramsey, Nikki · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Anna Miskelly
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 2-6, 1-0
Teams44 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level11 levels played
2.5
100%
7W–0L · 65.4% of games
3.0
87.5%
7W–1L · 64.3% of games
3.5
95.5%
21W–1L · 69.1% of games
4.0
75%
24W–8L · 58.7% of games
6.5
50%
3W–3L · 57.8% of games
7.5
66.7%
8W–4L · 56.1% of games
8.5
55.6%
5W–4L · 52.6% of games
3.5mixed
85.7%
6W–1L · 66.1% of games
4.0mixed
50%
7W–7L · 53.1% of games
6.0mixed
80%
4W–1L · 64.8% of games
7.0mixed
100%
7W–0L · 68.9% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 36% of the time
#1 Doubles
36%
47 matches
#2 Doubles
23%
29 matches
#3 Doubles
23%
29 matches
#2 Singles
9%
12 matches
#1 Singles
9%
11 matches
#3 Singles
1%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You have to believe in the long term plan you have but you need the short term goals to motivate and inspire you.
Roger Federer