← Search

Anne Marie Littrell

Tupelo, MS
3.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
54 matches · 29W–25L · seasons 2024–2026

Captains: add Anne Marie Littrell to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history54 matches
L
Jennifer Averette / Lindsey Stevens
2026-08-30 · #3 Doubles · 6.5 · with Amy Williams
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 1-6
W
2026-08-25 · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Brandi Brown
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 7-5, 1-0
W
2026-07-15 · Lindsey 40+ TRI · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Lacey Harden
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 6-4
W
2026-06-30 · Lindsey 40+ TRI · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Amy Williams
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 4-6, 1-0
W
2026-06-23 · Reed/AustinMize · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Jeff Buse mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-1, 6-3
L
2026-06-15 · Reed/AustinMize · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Damon Ladner mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
1-6, 6-2, 1-0
L
2026-05-18 · Reed/AustinMize · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Danny Thompson mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 1-6
W
2026-05-07 · 2026 3.0 Austin/Reed 40+ · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Lacey Harden
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-2
W
2026-04-29 · Z Park · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Lacey Harden
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 6-1
W
2026-04-21 · 2026 3.0 Austin/Reed 40+ · #1 Singles · 3.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-1
W
2026-04-19 · 2026 3.0 Austin/Reed 40+ · #1 Singles · 3.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-4
W
2026-04-19 · Z Park · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Ashton Scarborough
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-0
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams38 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level6 levels played
2.5
1W–2L
not enough matches yet
3.0
62.5%
15W–9L · 56.8% of games
3.5
33.3%
3W–6L · 42.9% of games
6.5
57.1%
4W–3L · 50% of games
7.5
0W–1L
not enough matches yet
3.0mixed
60%
6W–4L · 58.2% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #3 Doubles, 32% of the time
#3 Doubles
32%
17 matches
#2 Doubles
30%
16 matches
#1 Doubles
26%
14 matches
#1 Singles
11%
6 matches
#3 Singles
2%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

It’s one of the reasons why I like tennis so much. Because you have to figure it out on your own.
Roger Federer