← Search

Emily Decker

Tupelo, MS
3.0C year-end 2024
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
18 matches · 6W–12L · seasons 2024–2026

Captains: add Emily Decker to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history18 matches
L
2026-08-12 · Z Park Combo · #2 Doubles · 5.5 · with Kim Bailey
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-7, 0-1
L
2026-07-15 · Edwards · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Joy Whittle
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 4-6
L
Lindsey Stevens
2026-05-13 · Gilliland/Duke 3.0W 40+ · #1 Singles · 3.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 2-6
L
2026-05-05 · Z Park · #2 Singles · 3.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 1-6
L
2026-04-29 · Z Park · #2 Singles · 3.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 0-6
W
2026-03-22 · Z Park · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Lacey Harden
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 6-1, 1-0
L
2026-03-15 · Gilliland/Duke 3.0W 40+ · #1 Singles · 3.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 2-6
L
2024-10-02 · Gracie Menetre · #2 Doubles · 5.5 · with Callan Rowley
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 2-6
W
2024-09-19 · Gracie Menetre · #2 Doubles · 5.5 · with Ashton Scarborough
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-3
W
2024-05-15 · Edwards · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Gracie Menetre
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-0
L
2024-05-07 · Mize- Tupelo- TCC · #2 Singles · 3.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 2-6
L
2024-05-02 · Mize- Tupelo- TCC · #2 Singles · 3.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 4-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams36 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level2 levels played
3.0
33.3%
5W–10L · 43.8% of games
5.5
1W–2L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Singles, 39% of the time
#1 Singles
39%
7 matches
#2 Doubles
22%
4 matches
#2 Singles
22%
4 matches
#3 Doubles
17%
3 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

It’s one of the reasons why I like tennis so much. Because you have to figure it out on your own.
Roger Federer