Susan Thornquist
Woodridge, IL
133 matches · 52W–81L · seasons 2019–2026
Captains: add Susan Thornquist to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.
Match history133 matches
W
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-0
L
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 1-4
W
N/A
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-0
L
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 0-6
W
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 4-0
L
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 5-7
L
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 4-6, 0-1
L
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 6-7
L
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 0-6, 0-1
W
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-1
W
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 2-6, 1-0
W
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 7-5
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams42 teams · 2021–2027
CHI E 18W4.0 1.Tam Wright Fri 7:30 $25
CHI E 18W4.5 2.NTC Richards Sat 6 $25
CHI E 40W4.5 2.NTC Richards Sat 4 $25
CDTA E 18&OW4.5 3Naper Richards Sat 6 $24
CDTA E 40&OW4.5 2Naper Blaauw Sat 4 $24
CDTA E 55&OW9.0 1Naper DeMari Sat 4 $24
CDTA S 18&OW4.0 2.Tam Wright Fri 7 $22
CDTA S 18&OW4.5 3.NTC Richards Wed 7 $24
CDTA S 40&OW4.5 4.NTC Blaauw Sat 4 $24
CDTA W 18&OW4.0 5.Tam Wright Fri 7:30 $22
CDTA W 18&OW4.5 3.Naper Richards Sat 6 $24
CDTA W 40&OW4.5 2.Naper Blaauw Sat 4 $24
CDTA W 55&OW9.0 1.Naper DeMari Sat 4 $24
CDTA W 65&OW8.0 2.Naper Wiet Tue 1 $24
NITA S 80W55a Rush Copley-Adams
NITA S 80W65b Schaumburg-Paffrath
NITA W 40W18f Oak Brook-Lukas
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level5 levels played
4.0
71.4%
5W–2L · 63.5% of games
4.5
38%
35W–57L · 47.3% of games
8.0
44.4%
4W–5L · 51.3% of games
8.5
18.2%
2W–9L · 43.6% of games
9.0
50%
3W–3L · 53.8% of games
Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.
By lineusually #3 Doubles, 55% of the time
#3 Doubles
55%
73 matches
#2 Doubles
28%
37 matches
#1 Doubles
14%
18 matches
#1 Singles
2%
3 matches
#2 Singles
1%
1 match
#4 Doubles
1%
1 match
How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.
Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.
Success is a journey, not a destination. The doing is often more important than the outcome.