← Search

Beth Riggert

Elkhorn, NE
3.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
48 matches · 26W–22L · seasons 2022–2026

Captains: add Beth Riggert to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history48 matches
L
2026-08-24 · Kennedy · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Alexa Mead
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 4-6
W
2026-06-22 · Kennedy · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Jill Irwin
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-2
W
2026-06-15 · Kennedy · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Jill Irwin
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-1
W
2026-06-06 · Kennedy · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Jill Irwin
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-1
W
Julie Davis / Cheryl Schmidt
2026-06-03 · Kennedy · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Atsuko Christensen
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-4
W
2026-05-11 · Kennedy · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Jill Irwin
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-4
W
2026-04-12 · McDill · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Deborah McDill
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-2
W
2026-03-28 · McDill · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Alexa Mead
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 7-6
L
Beth Kramer / Julie Davis
2026-03-15 · McDill · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Kate Stober
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 2-6
W
2026-03-08 · Raikes · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Erin Giannangelo
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-4
W
2026-03-01 · Raikes · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Erin Giannangelo
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-2
L
2026-02-01 · Raikes · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Deborah McDill
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 3-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams12 teams · 2022–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level3 levels played
3.0
43.8%
14W–18L · 49.7% of games
3.5
55.6%
5W–4L · 50.3% of games
7.0
100%
7W–0L · 70.9% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 48% of the time
#1 Doubles
48%
23 matches
#2 Doubles
21%
10 matches
#3 Doubles
21%
10 matches
#2 Singles
8%
4 matches
#1 Singles
2%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You have to take the initiative and play your game. Confidence is just believing you can do it.
Chris Evert