← Search

Cecilia Gold

Oxford, MS
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
10 matches · 4W–6L · seasons 2023–2025

Captains: add Cecilia Gold to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history10 matches
W
2025-04-06 · Dye- NC- Oxford · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Lynn Gibson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-3
W
2025-03-17 · Dye- NC- Oxford · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Lynn Gibson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 6-3, 1-0
L
2025-03-03 · Dye- NC- Oxford · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Cathy Sabbatini
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 4-6
L
2024-04-21 · Ferguson - Oxford - NC · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Semmes van Brocklin
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-5
L
Cindy Miller / Jorianne Siskin
2024-04-16 · Ferguson - Oxford - NC · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Charlotte Parks
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 3-6, 1-0
L
Missy Gulick / Christina Britt
2024-04-14 · Ferguson - Oxford - NC · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Charlotte Parks
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 1-6
W
2024-04-07 · Ferguson - Oxford - NC · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Charlotte Parks
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 6-0, 1-0
W
Cindy Miller / Sonia Castany
2024-04-04 · Ferguson - Oxford - NC · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Marylyle Boolos
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 6-3, 1-0
L
2023-04-01 · Ferguson /Oxford 55+ 4.0 - Oxford - FNC · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Charlotte Parks
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 4-6
L
2023-04-01 · Ferguson /Oxford 55+ 4.0 - Oxford - FNC · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Charlotte Parks
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 4-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams6 teams · 2021–2025
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level2 levels played
3.5
2W–1L
not enough matches yet
4.0
28.6%
2W–5L · 42.2% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 40% of the time
#1 Doubles
40%
4 matches
#2 Doubles
40%
4 matches
#3 Doubles
20%
2 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Every match is a story with a beginning, a middle and an end, and you are writing it as you go.
Chris Evert