← Search

Stacey Hyde

— year-end
127 matches · 77W–50L · seasons 2024–2026

Captains: add Stacey Hyde to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history127 matches
L
2026-08-30 · Martin/Memphis · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Robin Thomas
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-7
W
2026-08-30 · Conrad/Memphis · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Jessica Lancaster
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-2
W
Heather Patterson / Abby G Patterson
2026-08-30 · Echols/ Memphis · #2 Doubles · 8.5 · with Emily Gallops
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 6-4, 1-0
W
2026-08-26 · Conrad/Memphis · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Sol Weaver
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 6-1
L
2026-08-09 · Conrad/Memphis · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Rachel Reddin
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-4, 1-0
W
2026-08-08 · Martin/Memphis · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Robin Thomas
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-3
L
2026-08-08 · Davis/Memphis · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Rachel Reddin
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3
L
2026-07-01 · Hollis/Memphis · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Daniel Forbes mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 4-6
W
2026-06-29 · Hyde/Memphis · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Laura Hollis-Talley
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 4-6, 1-0
W
2026-06-24 · Hyde/Memphis · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Laura Hollis-Talley
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-3
L
2026-06-17 · Flesch/Memphis · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Rachel Baker
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 7-6, 0-1
W
2026-06-15 · Hyde/Memphis · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Darlene Loprete
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-1
Teams90 teams · 2021–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level5 levels played
4.0
72.4%
55W–21L · 59.5% of games
4.5
27.3%
3W–8L · 35.6% of games
7.5
52.4%
11W–10L · 54.9% of games
8.5
33.3%
2W–4L · 39.4% of games
4.0mixed
46.2%
6W–7L · 49.8% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 45% of the time
#1 Doubles
45%
57 matches
#2 Doubles
39%
50 matches
#3 Doubles
12%
15 matches
#2 Singles
2%
2 matches
#4 Doubles
2%
2 matches
#1 Singles
1%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Start where you are. Use what you have. Do what you can.
Arthur Ashe