← Search

Jorianne Siskin

— year-end
96 matches · 41W–55L · seasons 2024–2026

Captains: add Jorianne Siskin to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history96 matches
L
Whitney Hayes / Stephanie White
2026-09-10 · Siler/Memphis · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Karin Rubnitz
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 0-6
L
2026-09-09 · Siler/Memphis · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Ashley Huggins
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 2-6
L
2026-09-03 · Siler/Memphis · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Karin Rubnitz
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 7-5, 1-0
L
2026-09-01 · Siskin/Memphis · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Marta Mullinix
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 1-6
L
2026-08-27 · Siler/Memphis · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Natalie Royal
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 3-6
W
2026-08-20 · Siler/Memphis · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Natalie Royal
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-3, 1-0
L
2026-08-19 · Siskin/Memphis · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Karin Rubnitz
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 6-3, 0-1
L
2026-08-13 · Siler/Memphis · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Carrie Siler
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 3-6
L
2026-08-11 · Siskin/Memphis · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Karen Franklin
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 1-6
L
Emily Brown / Kate Stakem
2026-07-30 · Baker/Memphis · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Debbie Carey
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 1-6
L
2026-06-04 · Baker/Memphis · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Rachel Baker
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 2-6
W
2026-05-06 · Martin/Memphis · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Alyssa Ivey
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 7-5
Teams79 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level5 levels played
4.0
50%
34W–34L · 48.5% of games
4.5
0W–3L
not enough matches yet
7.5
23.8%
5W–16L · 39.1% of games
8.5
1W–1L
not enough matches yet
4.0mixed
1W–1L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 39% of the time
#1 Doubles
39%
37 matches
#2 Doubles
28%
27 matches
#3 Doubles
26%
25 matches
#4 Doubles
6%
6 matches
#1 Singles
1%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Losing is not my enemy. Fear of losing is my enemy.
Rafael Nadal