← Search

Mary Weiss

— year-end
166 matches · 61W–105L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Mary Weiss to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history166 matches
L
2026-07-08 · Blake/Reitz · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Heather Rechtin
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 3-5, 0-1
L
2026-06-17 · Blake/Reitz · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Ann Eveker
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 2-6
W
2026-06-03 · Blake/Reitz · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Sue Beckring
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-4
W
2026-03-22 · Moore/Wheeler (S) · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Michelle Kellogg
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 1-2
L
2026-02-15 · Moore/Wheeler (S) · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Missy McCormick
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 2-6
L
2025-11-11 · Conway/Hepfinger (FD) · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Robin Shiras-Cody
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 3-6
L
2025-11-09 · Moore/Wheeler (F) · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Ann Grassle
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 1-6
L
2025-10-19 · Moore/Wheeler (F) · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Dana Mazzier
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 5-7
L
2025-09-21 · Moore/Wheeler (F) · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Carren Rogan
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 3-6
L
2025-09-09 · Conway/Hepfinger (FD) · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Judy Frain
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 1-6
L
2025-09-07 · Moore/Wheeler (F) · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Dana Mazzier
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 0-6
L
2025-07-23 · Blake · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Dana Mazzier
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 3-6
Teams35 teams · 2020–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level4 levels played
3.0
0W–3L
not enough matches yet
3.5
77.8%
7W–2L · 58.7% of games
4.0
35.8%
53W–95L · 42.8% of games
8.0mixed
16.7%
1W–5L · 32.3% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 40% of the time
#2 Doubles
40%
66 matches
#3 Doubles
31%
51 matches
#1 Doubles
27%
45 matches
#2 Singles
1%
2 matches
#4 Doubles
1%
2 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

I really think a champion is defined not by their wins but by how they can recover when they fall.
Serena Williams