← Search

Jamie Hansen

SAINT LOUIS, MO
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
211 matches · 126W–85L · seasons 2019–2027

Captains: add Jamie Hansen to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history211 matches
W
2026-09-13 · Moore-Wheeler (F) · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Victoria Wheeler
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 6-4
W
2026-08-23 · Mixed Mayhem (Bostick) · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Jim Enright mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-2, 3-6, 1-0
W
2026-08-16 · Mixed Mayhem (Bostick) · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Keith Nilsen mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 3-6, 1-0
L
2026-07-26 · Mixed Mayhem (Bostick) · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Keith Nilsen mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 4-6
L
2026-07-19 · Mixed Mayhem (Bostick) · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Jim Enright mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-5, 3-5, 0-1
W
2026-07-12 · Mixed Mayhem (Bostick) · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Jim Enright mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-0, 6-0
W
2026-07-09 · Kellogg/Grassle · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Victoria Wheeler
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-2
W
2026-07-08 · White/Hardebeck · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Billie Hardebeck
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-4
W
2026-07-02 · Kellogg/Grassle · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Julie Jackman
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-4
L
2026-06-24 · White/Hardebeck · #1 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 4-4, 1-0
W
2026-06-17 · White/Hardebeck · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Angie Patton
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-2
W
2026-06-14 · Mixed Mayhem (Bostick) · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Keith Nilsen mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
1-6, 6-4, 1-0
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams47 teams · 2020–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level7 levels played
2.5
65%
13W–7L · 57.6% of games
3.0
58.2%
32W–23L · 55.2% of games
3.5
62%
49W–30L · 57.3% of games
4.0
40%
6W–9L · 44.4% of games
3.0mixed
3W–0L
not enough matches yet
6.0mixed
80%
8W–2L · 65.7% of games
7.0mixed
51.7%
15W–14L · 48% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 26% of the time
#1 Doubles
26%
55 matches
#2 Singles
26%
55 matches
#1 Singles
19%
41 matches
#2 Doubles
14%
30 matches
#3 Doubles
14%
30 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

What matters isn’t how well you play when you’re playing well. What matters is how well you play when you’re playing badly.
Martina Navratilova