← Search

Ann Eveker

Saint Louis, MO
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
185 matches · 102W–83L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Ann Eveker to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history185 matches
L
2026-06-24 · Blake/Reitz · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Heather Rechtin
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 1-6
L
2026-06-17 · Blake/Reitz · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Mary Weiss
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 2-6
W
2026-05-20 · Blake/Reitz · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Anne Skelton
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-0
L
2026-04-09 · Blake/Reitz · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Lauri McNabb
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 3-6
W
2026-03-23 · Boyd/Eveker · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Elizabeth Lefton
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 3-3, 1-0
L
2025-07-16 · Blake/Reitz · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Anne Skelton
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 3-6, 0-1
W
2025-07-12 · Blake/Reitz · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Anne Skelton
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 6-4, 1-0
L
2025-07-09 · Blake/Reitz · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Lauri McNabb
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 2-6, 1-0
W
2025-06-21 · Blake/Reitz · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Margaret West
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-2
W
2025-06-11 · Blake/Reitz · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Anne Skelton
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-3
L
2025-05-21 · Boyd/Eveker · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Karen Toal
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 1-6
L
2025-05-10 · Boyd/Eveker · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Margreta Talen
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 5-7
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams44 teams · 2020–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level2 levels played
3.5
53.1%
76W–67L · 51.1% of games
7.0
61.9%
26W–16L · 54.6% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 49% of the time
#2 Doubles
49%
91 matches
#3 Doubles
28%
52 matches
#1 Doubles
22%
41 matches
#4 Doubles
1%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Tennis is mostly mental. You win or lose the match before you even go out there.
Venus Williams