← Search

Vicki Swank

Cary, NC
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
101 matches · 39W–62L · seasons 2020–2026

Captains: add Vicki Swank to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history101 matches
L
2026-07-17 · Je.Wolborsky40M3.5 · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Frank Delucia mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 2-6
L
2026-06-26 · Je.Wolborsky40M3.5 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Scott Thurston mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 0-6
L
2026-06-05 · Je.Wolborsky40M3.5 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Mike Tormey mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 6-7
L
2026-05-12 · TOC.Felten · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Kim Goll
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 2-6
L
2026-05-05 · TOC.Felten · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Jessie Brinkley
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 4-6
W
2026-04-21 · TOC.Felten · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Jannifer Frazier
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 6-2
L
2026-04-15 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Jessie Brinkley
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 7-6, 1-0
L
2026-04-08 · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Cecilia Edgar
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 2-6
L
2026-04-07 · TOC.Felten · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Patricia Batuna
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 1-6
L
2026-03-25 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Alison Whatley
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 3-6
L
2026-03-24 · TOC.Felten · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Alison Whatley
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 6-7
L
2026-03-18 · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Alison Whatley
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 1-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams22 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level5 levels played
0.0
20%
1W–4L · 28.4% of games
3.5
39.7%
25W–38L · 44.4% of games
4.0
0W–2L
not enough matches yet
6.5
60%
12W–8L · 55.9% of games
3.5mixed
0%
0W–6L · 29.1% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 45% of the time
#2 Doubles
45%
45 matches
#3 Doubles
31%
31 matches
#1 Doubles
23%
23 matches
#4 Doubles
2%
2 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You always want to win. That is why you play tennis, because you love the sport and try to be the best you can.
Roger Federer