← Search

Katie Elder

— year-end
250 matches · 170W–80L · seasons 2022–2026

Captains: add Katie Elder to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history250 matches
W
2026-09-10 · TOC.Friddle · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Hanna Sturgis
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 5-5
W
2026-09-08 · EHoover.40C-CCC · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Nancy Sickel
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 7-6
W
2026-09-07 · SFranks.7.5C-DUR · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Kelsey Norris
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-2
W
2026-09-01 · EHoover.40C-CCC · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Katherine Leib
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-0
W
2026-08-31 · JOgle.40C-CCC · #2 Doubles · 6.5 · with Mercer Griffin
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-2
W
2026-08-31 · APlachco.18C-DUR · #3 Doubles · 8.5 · with Katherine Leib
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-2
W
2026-08-25 · EHoover.40C-CCC · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Katherine Leib
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 7-6
W
2026-08-24 · APlachco.18C-DUR · #3 Doubles · 8.5 · with Katherine Leib
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-4
L
2026-08-20 · TOC.Friddle · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Christine Burr
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 3-6
W
2026-08-20 · SFranks.7.5C-DUR · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Kim El
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-4
L
2026-08-17 · JOgle.40C-CCC · #2 Doubles · 6.5 · with Blake Ellis
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 2-6
W
2026-08-13 · TOC.Friddle · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Chrissy Morgan
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-7, 1-0
Teams70 teams · 2022–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level13 levels played
0.0
0W–1L
not enough matches yet
2.5
33.3%
2W–4L · 41.4% of games
3.0
66.7%
20W–10L · 58.9% of games
3.5
68.3%
43W–20L · 57.6% of games
4.0
55.2%
16W–13L · 53.6% of games
5.5
100%
4W–0L · 61.2% of games
6.5
79.4%
27W–7L · 63.4% of games
7.5
78.3%
18W–5L · 57.7% of games
8.5
2W–1L
not enough matches yet
3.5mixed
78.6%
11W–3L · 59.3% of games
4.0mixed
62.5%
5W–3L · 50% of games
6.0mixed
50%
2W–2L · 47.9% of games
7.0mixed
75%
3W–1L · 59.8% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 52% of the time
#1 Doubles
52%
129 matches
#2 Doubles
30%
75 matches
#3 Doubles
16%
41 matches
#3 Singles
1%
2 matches
#1 Singles
0%
1 match
#2 Singles
0%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

I really think a champion is defined not by their wins but by how they can recover when they fall.
Serena Williams