← Search

Kathy Wennemann

— year-end
346 matches · 155W–191L · seasons 2019–2027

Captains: add Kathy Wennemann to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history346 matches
L
2026-09-13 · Burke-Wennemann (F) · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Lolly Cottrell
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 2-6
W
2026-09-12 · Wennemann · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Ellen Mrazek
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 6-0
L
2026-07-08 · Mrazek · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Vicki Goetz
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 1-6
L
2026-06-23 · Mrazek · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Ellen Mrazek
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 4-6, 0-1
W
2026-06-09 · Mrazek · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Ellen Mrazek
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-1
L
2026-06-03 · Mrazek · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Jane Hamm
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 3-6
L
2026-06-02 · Mrazek · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Lolly Cottrell
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 4-6
W
2026-05-27 · Mrazek · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Ellen Mrazek
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-3
W
2026-05-07 · Burkart/Rechtlich · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Andrea Greco
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-4
L
2026-04-26 · Burke/Wenneman (S) · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Vicki Goetz
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 2-6
L
2026-04-23 · Burkart/Rechtlich · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Vicki Goetz
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 2-6
W
2026-04-22 · Mrazek/McKie (SD) · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Vicki Goetz
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-4
Teams64 teams · 2020–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level8 levels played
2.5
0W–1L
not enough matches yet
3.0
1W–2L
not enough matches yet
3.5
56.1%
96W–75L · 52.9% of games
4.0
24%
24W–76L · 42.9% of games
7.0
61.7%
29W–18L · 53.7% of games
8.0
27.3%
3W–8L · 43.2% of games
7.0mixed
0W–3L
not enough matches yet
8.0mixed
20%
2W–8L · 38.3% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 54% of the time
#1 Doubles
54%
188 matches
#2 Doubles
32%
111 matches
#3 Doubles
14%
47 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Every match is a story with a beginning, a middle and an end, and you are writing it as you go.
Chris Evert