← Search

Teri Hirt

— year-end
66 matches · 22W–44L · seasons 2024–2026

Captains: add Teri Hirt to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history66 matches
W
Rebecca Brower / Blake Adams
2026-09-01 · Lane/Memphis · #2 Doubles · 6.5 · with Susan Charping
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 4-6, 1-0
L
Shawnelle Davis / Kelly Baker
2026-07-22 · Wittke/Memphis · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Katherine Slater
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 4-6, 0-1
L
Elizabeth Johnson / Ashley Lunsford
2026-06-24 · Wittke/Memphis · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Aimee Puryear
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 1-6
L
Karen Franklin / Elizabeth Novick
2026-06-17 · Wittke/Memphis · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Jill Bishop
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 4-6
L
2026-05-07 · O'Neill/Memphis · #1 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 3-6
L
2026-04-26 · Moore/Memphis · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Madeline Hirt
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-4, 0-1
W
2026-04-16 · O'Neill/Memphis · #1 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 7-6
L
2026-04-14 · Hirt/Memphis · #1 Singles · 3.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 4-6
L
2026-04-12 · Moore/Memphis · #2 Singles · 3.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 0-6
W
2026-04-08 · Hirt/Memphis · #1 Singles · 3.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 6-0, 1-0
L
2026-04-02 · O'Neill/Memphis · #1 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 0-6
W
2026-03-31 · Moore/Memphis · #2 Singles · 3.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 6-2
Teams42 teams · 2021–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level4 levels played
3.0
47.4%
18W–20L · 51.2% of games
3.5
11.1%
2W–16L · 28.6% of games
5.5
20%
1W–4L · 35.8% of games
6.5
20%
1W–4L · 38.9% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Singles, 33% of the time
#1 Singles
33%
22 matches
#2 Singles
21%
14 matches
#3 Doubles
17%
11 matches
#2 Doubles
15%
10 matches
#1 Doubles
9%
6 matches
#4 Doubles
5%
3 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

It’s one of the reasons why I like tennis so much. Because you have to figure it out on your own.
Roger Federer