← Search

Elizabeth Novick

Collierville, TN
3.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
56 matches · 19W–37L · seasons 2024–2026

Captains: add Elizabeth Novick to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history56 matches
W
2026-09-02 · Brackett/Memphis · #2 Doubles · 6.5 · with Katrina Moore
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-2
W
2026-09-02 · Sutton/Memphis · #3 Doubles · 6.5 · with Cindy Barnett
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-1
W
2026-08-31 · Nair/Memphis · #1 Doubles · 5.5 · with Becky Brady
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-2
W
2026-08-30 · Nair/Memphis · #2 Doubles · 5.5 · with Becky Brady
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-1
L
2026-08-26 · Nair/Memphis · #1 Doubles · 5.5 · with Suzanne Franks
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 2-6
W
2026-08-16 · Sutton/Memphis · #2 Doubles · 6.5 · with Glaucia Novoa
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-2
L
2026-08-13 · Nair/Memphis · #1 Doubles · 5.5 · with Renee DeGutis
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 3-6, 0-1
L
2026-08-12 · Brackett/Memphis · #3 Doubles · 6.5 · with Nancy McBride
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 4-6
L
2026-08-09 · Sutton/Memphis · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Roz Wallace
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 3-6
W
2026-07-08 · Brackett/Memphis · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Maria Gonzalez
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-0
L
2026-07-01 · Brackett/Memphis · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Karen Franklin
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 5-7
W
2026-06-25 · Brackett/Memphis · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Maria Gonzalez
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 6-3
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams54 teams · 2021–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level5 levels played
3.0
75%
3W–1L · 60.3% of games
3.5
22.2%
6W–21L · 41.6% of games
4.0
14.3%
1W–6L · 36.5% of games
5.5
50%
2W–2L · 54.3% of games
6.5
50%
7W–7L · 48.1% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #3 Doubles, 34% of the time
#3 Doubles
34%
19 matches
#1 Doubles
21%
12 matches
#2 Doubles
18%
10 matches
#1 Singles
16%
9 matches
#2 Singles
9%
5 matches
#4 Doubles
2%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

I really think a champion is defined not by their wins but by how they can recover when they fall.
Serena Williams