← Search

Jill Bishop

Germantown, TN
3.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
74 matches · 44W–30L · seasons 2024–2026

Captains: add Jill Bishop to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history74 matches
W
Jamie Harris / Lisa McIntosh
2026-08-26 · Lane/Memphis · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Randi Mullaney
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 7-5, 1-0
L
2026-08-25 · Lane/Memphis · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Heidi Wharton
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-7
W
2026-08-20 · Lane/Memphis · #3 Doubles · 6.5 · with Heidi Wharton
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-2
W
2026-08-12 · Lane/Memphis · #3 Doubles · 6.5 · with Raquel Lane
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-4
W
2026-07-16 · Martin/Memphis · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Janine Lammel
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-0
W
Elizabeth Johnson / Shannon Boyd
2026-07-15 · Wittke/Memphis · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Lauren Bloodworth
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-1
W
2026-07-07 · Martin/Memphis · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Lauren Bloodworth
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-2
L
Elizabeth Novick / Maria Gonzalez
2026-06-25 · Wittke/Memphis · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Lauren Bloodworth
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 3-6
W
2026-06-18 · Martin/Memphis · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Lauren Bloodworth
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 7-6
L
Karen Franklin / Elizabeth Novick
2026-06-17 · Wittke/Memphis · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Teri Hirt
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 4-6
L
2026-06-02 · Martin/Memphis · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Claudia Ziegler
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 2-6
W
2026-04-29 · Hirt/Memphis · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Claudia Ziegler
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 2-6, 1-0
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams49 teams · 2021–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level4 levels played
3.0
57.1%
32W–24L · 53.6% of games
3.5
50%
2W–2L · 47.1% of games
5.5
50%
2W–2L · 41.9% of games
6.5
80%
8W–2L · 62.6% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 39% of the time
#2 Doubles
39%
29 matches
#3 Doubles
39%
29 matches
#1 Doubles
20%
15 matches
#4 Doubles
1%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

I don’t want to be somebody else. I want to be myself and win in my way.
Rafael Nadal