← Search

Amber Jordan

Georgetown, TX
4.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
154 matches · 73W–81L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Amber Jordan to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history154 matches
L
2026-07-25 · Grip It and Rip It · #2 Doubles · 8.5 · with Lori Durham
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 3-6
W
2026-07-02 · UT 4.5 · #3 Doubles · 4.5 · with Susan Turner
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 4-6, 1-0
L
2026-06-21 · That Was In! · #3 Doubles · 9.0 · with Devin Stauffer mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 1-6
W
2026-06-20 · 4.5 Simply Smashing · #3 Doubles · 4.5 · with Rebecca Stephens
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-0
L
2026-06-06 · 4.5 Simply Smashing · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Rebecca Stephens
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 4-6
L
2026-06-02 · UT 4.5 · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Stephanie Stephens
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 1-4
L
2026-05-26 · UT 4.5 · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Susan Pyle
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 3-6
L
2026-05-19 · UT 4.5 · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with Stephanie Stephens
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 4-6
L
2026-05-16 · 4.5 Simply Smashing · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with Lori Durham
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 6-2, 0-1
L
2026-05-13 · UT 4.5 · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with Lisa Damico Anderson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 2-6
L
2026-05-03 · That Was In! · #2 Doubles · 9.0 · with Jai Karve mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 1-6
L
2026-04-25 · 4.5 Simply Smashing · #1 Singles · 4.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 0-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams33 teams · 2021–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level5 levels played
4.0
62.7%
32W–19L · 51% of games
4.5
36.6%
26W–45L · 46.4% of games
8.5
0W–1L
not enough matches yet
8.0mixed
70.6%
12W–5L · 53% of games
9.0mixed
15.4%
2W–11L · 37.3% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 31% of the time
#1 Doubles
31%
48 matches
#2 Doubles
31%
47 matches
#3 Doubles
18%
27 matches
#1 Singles
13%
20 matches
#2 Singles
4%
6 matches
#4 Doubles
4%
6 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

It’s one of the reasons why I like tennis so much. Because you have to figure it out on your own.
Roger Federer