← Search

Emily F Whitnell

LEXINGTON, KY
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
59 matches · 49W–10L · seasons 2023–2026

Captains: add Emily F Whitnell to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history59 matches
L
2026-08-14 · KY/LEX/Perbert · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Erin Stoffer
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 7-5, 0-1
W
2026-07-25 · KY/LEX/Owens/Ross · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Zach Young mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-6, 6-2
W
2026-07-20 · KY/LEX/Owens/Ross · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Jonathan Profitt mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-7, 6-3, 1-0
W
2026-07-17 · KY/LEX/Owens/Ross · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Chase Wooley mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 6-1
L
2026-07-02 · KY/LEX/Owens/Ross · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Jonathan Profitt mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 6-7
W
2026-06-26 · KY/LEX/Owens/Ross · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Benny Evans mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-1, 6-4
W
2026-05-27 · KY/LEX/Humbert/Whitnell · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Laurel Humbert
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-3
W
2026-04-23 · KY/LEX/Humbert/Whitnell · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Sarah Owens
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-2
W
2026-04-18 · KY/LEX/Humbert/Whitnell · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Emily J Whitnell
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-2
L
2026-03-27 · KY/LEX/Humbert/Whitnell · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Sarah Beth Waterman
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 6-7
W
2026-03-16 · KY/LEX/Humbert/Whitnell · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Hannah Wampler
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-2
W
2025-11-12 · KY/LEX/HUMBERT · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Brooke Bridges
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-2
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams36 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level5 levels played
3.5
100%
9W–0L · 66.9% of games
4.0
78.3%
18W–5L · 64.5% of games
7.5
75%
9W–3L · 60.9% of games
4.0mixed
81.8%
9W–2L · 61.2% of games
7.0mixed
100%
4W–0L · 77.4% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 51% of the time
#1 Doubles
51%
30 matches
#2 Doubles
31%
18 matches
#3 Doubles
14%
8 matches
#2 Singles
3%
2 matches
#1 Singles
2%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You have to take the initiative and play your game. Confidence is just believing you can do it.
Chris Evert