← Search

David Slater

Stamford, CT
5.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
15 matches · 12W–3L · seasons 2021–2025

Captains: add David Slater to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history15 matches
L
2025-07-21 · Saw Mill Club · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Andrew Finn
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 7-6, 0-1
W
2025-06-30 · Saw Mill Club · #3 Doubles · 4.5 · with David Lerner
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 7-5
W
2025-06-23 · Saw Mill Club · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with David Lerner
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-3
L
2025-06-09 · Saw Mill Club · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with Garvey Rene
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 2-6, 0-1
W
2025-06-02 · Saw Mill Club · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with Larry Teitelbaum
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-0
W
2024-07-22 · Southern: Saw Mill Club · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Christopher Zobler
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-2
W
2023-07-20 · Southern: Saw Mill Club · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Pierre-Marie Despontin
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-4
W
2023-07-10 · Southern: Saw Mill Club · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Robert Reby
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 6-3, 1-0
W
2023-06-05 · Southern: Saw Mill Club · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Andrew Finn
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 6-4
W
2023-05-01 · Southern: Saw Mill Club · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with David Ulrich
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-3
W
2021-07-26 · Armonk Tennis Club · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with David Lerner
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-3
W
2021-07-19 · Armonk Tennis Club · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with David Lerner
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 6-1
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams5 teams · 2021–2025
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level1 levels played
4.5
80%
12W–3L · 61.2% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 67% of the time
#1 Doubles
67%
10 matches
#2 Doubles
27%
4 matches
#3 Doubles
7%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

I really think a champion is defined not by their wins but by how they can recover when they fall.
Serena Williams