← Search

Majd Babik

Richmond, VA
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
308 matches · 202W–106L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Majd Babik to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history308 matches
L
2026-09-08 · ACAC 8.5 Combo PK · #1 Doubles · 8.5 · with Ben Hall
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 4-6
W
2026-08-29 · ACAC 8.5 Combo PK · #3 Doubles · 8.5 · with Nathan Arland
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 6-2
L
2026-08-23 · ACAC 8.5 Combo PK · #2 Doubles · 8.5 · with Jason Voigt
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 5-7, 1-0
W
2026-08-01 · ACAC 8.5 Combo PK · #3 Doubles · 8.5 · with Alex Neuwelt
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-3
W
2026-07-26 · ACAC-Babik · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Christopher Chandler
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-3
L
2026-07-25 · ACAC-Babik · #4 Doubles · 4.0 · with Richard Sherman
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 4-6
W
2026-07-24 · ACAC-Babik · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Richard Sherman
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 6-7, 1-0
W
2026-07-19 · ACAC-Babik · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with William Price
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 6-2, 1-0
W
N/A
2026-07-15 · ACAC-Babik · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Keith Adams
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-0
W
2026-06-28 · ACAC-Babik · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with William Price
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 6-2
L
2026-06-17 · ACAC Double Shots-Bosch · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Sonya Carman mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 3-6
L
2026-06-14 · ACAC-Babik · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Christopher Chandler
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 4-6, 0-1
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams64 teams · 2020–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level9 levels played
4.0
70.6%
96W–40L · 56.7% of games
4.5
0W–1L
not enough matches yet
8.5
61.9%
13W–8L · 55.7% of games
7.0mixed
66.7%
4W–2L · 52.2% of games
7.5mixed
60%
9W–6L · 56.9% of games
8.0mixed
63.5%
33W–19L · 55.2% of games
8.5mixed
63.6%
7W–4L · 54.8% of games
9.0mixed
76.7%
23W–7L · 60.7% of games
9.5mixed
60%
3W–2L · 55.6% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 39% of the time
#1 Doubles
39%
121 matches
#2 Doubles
35%
107 matches
#3 Doubles
18%
54 matches
#1 Singles
6%
18 matches
#2 Singles
2%
7 matches
#4 Doubles
0%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

I don’t want to be somebody else. I want to be myself and win in my way.
Rafael Nadal