← Search

William Pilc

— year-end
53 matches · 25W–28L · seasons 2020–2026

Captains: add William Pilc to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history53 matches
L
2026-07-25 · TDC Shafer · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with Mark Knee
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 3-6
W
2026-07-25 · Westwood IcyHotz - Nilson · #4 Doubles · 4.0 · with Brian Rabhan
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-4
W
2026-07-21 · Westwood Old Farts - Payne · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Chuck Albertson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 6-4
L
2026-07-19 · TDC Shafer · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with David Lefkowitz
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 6-4, 0-1
L
2026-07-09 · Westwood Old Farts - Payne · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Charles Stafford
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 1-6
L
2026-06-29 · TDC Shafer · #3 Doubles · 4.5 · with Timothy Sherman
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 1-6
W
2026-06-28 · Westwood IcyHotz - Nilson · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Brian Rabhan
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 6-2
W
2026-06-25 · Westwood Old Farts - Payne · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Charles Stafford
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-2
L
2026-06-21 · TDC Shafer · #3 Doubles · 4.5 · with Scott Sorkin
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 5-7
L
2026-06-13 · Westwood IcyHotz - Nilson · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Walker Reid
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 2-6
L
Adam Decker / Richard Clark
2026-06-04 · Ridgetop - Blouch · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Kory Painter
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 6-4, 0-1
W
2026-05-31 · Westwood Peacocks - Cecil · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Michael Fanelli
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-2
Teams40 teams · 2020–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level5 levels played
4.0
58.3%
14W–10L · 56% of games
4.5
12.5%
1W–7L · 40.7% of games
8.0
60%
3W–2L · 55.2% of games
7.5mixed
50%
2W–2L · 56.1% of games
8.0mixed
55.6%
5W–4L · 52.5% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 42% of the time
#2 Doubles
42%
22 matches
#3 Doubles
30%
16 matches
#1 Doubles
26%
14 matches
#4 Doubles
2%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

It’s one of the reasons why I like tennis so much. Because you have to figure it out on your own.
Roger Federer