← Search

Ginger Cummins

Boise, ID
3.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
182 matches · 64W–118L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Ginger Cummins to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history182 matches
L
2026-08-27 · Going Places · #2 Doubles · 6.5 · with JP Shedoudi mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
1-6, 0-6
L
2026-08-18 · Going Places · #3 Doubles · 6.5 · with Aaron Wolter mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
0-6, 1-6
L
2026-08-09 · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Jackson Cramer mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
0-6, 0-6
W
2026-08-02 · #3 Doubles · with Jenny Grunke championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 7-5
W
Jackie Fuller / Tamara Gardner
2026-08-01 · #3 Doubles · with Jenny Grunke championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-3
L
2026-07-31 · #1 Doubles · with Jenny Grunke championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 4-6
L
2026-07-14 · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with JP Shedoudi mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 2-6
W
2026-07-09 · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Justin Carr mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-2, 3-6, 1-0
L
2026-06-24 · Each Hit 55+ · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Jenny Grunke
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 7-6, 0-1
W
2026-06-17 · Each Hit 55+ · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Jenny Grunke
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 6-7, 1-0
L
2026-06-15 · Each Hit 55+ · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Jenny Grunke
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-7
L
2026-06-11 · Simply Smashing · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Anke Heineck
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-4, 0-1
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams30 teams · 2020–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level7 levels played
3.0
45.5%
10W–12L · 46.5% of games
3.5
28.6%
16W–40L · 42.7% of games
4.0
0W–3L
not enough matches yet
7.0
58.3%
7W–5L · 52.4% of games
6.5mixed
43.8%
7W–9L · 49.2% of games
7.0mixed
27.1%
13W–35L · 43.2% of games
7.5mixed
25%
3W–9L · 43% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #3 Doubles, 39% of the time
#3 Doubles
39%
71 matches
#1 Doubles
32%
58 matches
#2 Doubles
28%
51 matches
#1 Singles
1%
1 match
#2 Singles
1%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

I don’t want to be somebody else. I want to be myself and win in my way.
Rafael Nadal