← Search

Rebecca Wehrle

Haledon, NJ
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
217 matches · 100W–117L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Rebecca Wehrle to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history217 matches
L
2026-08-15 · #2 Doubles · with Melissa Brod championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 1-6
L
2026-08-14 · #2 Doubles · with Kat Brown championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 6-4, 0-1
L
2026-07-06 · Gould/Welles · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Kat Brown
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-7
W
2026-06-29 · Gould/Welles · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Gail Shube
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 6-6
W
2026-06-28 · Gould/Welles · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Jeanne Straus
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 6-3
W
2026-06-11 · Gould/Welles · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Susan Zeigler
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-2
W
2026-06-10 · Gould/Welles · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Kat Brown
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-3
L
2026-05-28 · Gould/Welles · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Kat Brown
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 2-6
L
2026-04-30 · Gould/Welles · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Grace de Fries
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 4-6
L
2026-04-25 · #2 Doubles · with Kimberly Mark championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 3-6
W
2026-04-17 · #4 Doubles · with Kimberly Mark championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 6-1
L
2026-03-22 · Metro: Gould/Welles · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Grace de Fries
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 5-5
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams52 teams · 2020–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level6 levels played
3.5
63.3%
31W–18L · 53.6% of games
4.0
30.9%
21W–47L · 43.4% of games
7.5
1W–0L
not enough matches yet
7.0mixed
41.4%
12W–17L · 45.2% of games
7.5mixed
75%
3W–1L · 57.7% of games
8.0mixed
41.5%
17W–24L · 46.6% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 39% of the time
#2 Doubles
39%
85 matches
#1 Doubles
36%
79 matches
#3 Doubles
21%
45 matches
#4 Doubles
1%
3 matches
#3 Mixed Doubles
1%
2 matches
#1 Mixed Doubles
1%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

I really think a champion is defined not by their wins but by how they can recover when they fall.
Serena Williams