← Search

Kathleen Savage

Rochester, NY
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
165 matches · 101W–64L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Kathleen Savage to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history165 matches
W
2026-08-16 · #3 Doubles · with Carol Ryan championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 7-5
W
2026-08-15 · #2 Doubles · with Rita Kladstrup championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 6-1
W
Dianne Romano / Christine Rupp
2026-08-15 · #2 Doubles · with Rita Kladstrup championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-3
W
2026-08-14 · #3 Doubles · with Nancy O'Brien championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 7-5
L
2026-08-14 · #3 Doubles · with Nancy O'Brien championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 2-6
W
2026-08-11 · ROC: Chicks with Sticks · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Joanne Parkes
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 7-5
W
2026-08-05 · Challengers · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Keri Stanley
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-1
W
2026-08-04 · ROC: Chicks with Sticks · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Joanne Parkes
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-4, 1-0
W
2026-08-01 · #3 Doubles · with Nancy O'Brien championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-4
W
2026-08-01 · #2 Doubles · with Rita Kladstrup championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-4
W
2026-07-29 · Challengers · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Neerja Bhatnagar
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-3
W
2026-07-28 · ROC: Chicks with Sticks · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Joanne Parkes
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 6-2
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams32 teams · 2020–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level6 levels played
3.0
56.5%
13W–10L · 56.2% of games
3.5
72.4%
42W–16L · 61.6% of games
7.0
75%
3W–1L · 60% of games
8.0
3W–0L
not enough matches yet
6.0mixed
66.7%
10W–5L · 64.8% of games
7.0mixed
21.4%
3W–11L · 38.9% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #3 Doubles, 44% of the time
#3 Doubles
44%
72 matches
#2 Doubles
29%
48 matches
#1 Doubles
22%
37 matches
#4 Doubles
4%
7 matches
#1 Singles
1%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You always want to win. That is why you play tennis, because you love the sport and try to be the best you can.
Roger Federer