← Search

Christine Rodeo

New York, NY
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
208 matches · 125W–83L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Christine Rodeo to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history208 matches
W
2026-08-06 · Chen · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Valsey Bartley
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-4, 1-0
W
2026-07-27 · Chen · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Valsey Bartley
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 7-5
L
2026-07-26 · #2 Doubles · with Alexis Graf championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 3-6
L
2026-07-26 · #2 Doubles · with Alexis Graf championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 3-6
L
Elise LaCarrubba / Grace Liu
2026-07-25 · #1 Doubles · with Alexis Graf championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 2-6
W
N/A
2026-07-22 · Brooklyn: Bernstein · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Chih-Wei Chen
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-0
W
2026-07-20 · Chen · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Helen Xu
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 5-2
W
2026-07-14 · Brooklyn: Bernstein · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Cameron Suratt
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 7-5
W
2026-07-06 · Maselbas · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Alexis Graf
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 7-6
W
2026-06-29 · Maselbas · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Alexis Graf
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 6-1
L
2026-06-07 · Brooklyn: Bernstein · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Alexis Graf
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-4, 0-1
W
2026-05-15 · Maselbas · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Alexis Graf
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 5-2
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams70 teams · 2020–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level5 levels played
0.0
2W–1L
not enough matches yet
3.5
60.6%
60W–39L · 52.2% of games
4.0
0W–3L
not enough matches yet
7.0
79.2%
19W–5L · 64.1% of games
7.0mixed
64.8%
35W–19L · 58.1% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #3 Doubles, 38% of the time
#3 Doubles
38%
79 matches
#2 Doubles
36%
75 matches
#1 Doubles
16%
33 matches
#2 Singles
6%
13 matches
#1 Singles
3%
7 matches
#4 Doubles
1%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You always want to win. That is why you play tennis, because you love the sport and try to be the best you can.
Roger Federer