← Search

Christina Slade

PLYMOUTH, MI
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
360 matches · 252W–108L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Christina Slade to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history360 matches
W
2026-08-26 · CHIP-Sauld 8.5 COMBO MIX · #1 Doubles · 8.5 · with Paul Gill mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
1-6, 6-4, 1-0
L
Erin Robinson / David Pietrangelo
2026-08-19 · CHIP-Sauld 8.5 COMBO MIX · #1 Doubles · 8.5 · with Chandler Daub mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 5-7
L
2026-08-05 · CHIP-Sauld 8.5 COMBO MIX · #1 Doubles · 8.5 · with Chandler Daub mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 5-7
W
2026-08-04 · CHIP-Slade 18s 8.0X F · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Todd Schalk mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 6-1
W
2026-07-31 · #1 Doubles · with Kerri-Ann Croftchik championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-0
L
2026-07-31 · #2 Doubles · with Kerri-Ann Croftchik championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 1-6
W
2026-07-25 · #1 Doubles · with Anne-Marie Kim championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 7-6
W
2026-07-25 · #1 Doubles · with Jennifer Sauld championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-4
W
2026-07-10 · CHIP-Slade 18s 8.0X F · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Mitchell Gajar mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-7, 6-3, 1-0
W
2026-07-09 · LIB-Slade 40s 4.0 NW F1 · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Anne-Marie Kim
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-3
W
Paula Recknagel / Rachel Gottlieb-Smith
2026-07-07 · LIB-Sauld 18s 4.0 NW F2 · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Jennifer Sauld
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 6-3, 1-0
L
2026-07-02 · LIB-Slade 40s 4.0 NW F1 · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Kerri-Ann Croftchik
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 3-6, 0-1
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams69 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level17 levels played
0.0
71.4%
5W–2L · 56.6% of games
3.0
2W–0L
not enough matches yet
3.5
91.7%
11W–1L · 69.3% of games
4.0
76.8%
76W–23L · 60.3% of games
4.5
33.3%
2W–4L · 42.6% of games
6.5
100%
4W–0L · 71% of games
7.0
1W–0L
not enough matches yet
7.5
72.7%
16W–6L · 62% of games
8.0
80%
8W–2L · 60.3% of games
8.5
44.4%
4W–5L · 48.3% of games
9.0
2W–1L
not enough matches yet
6.0mixed
2W–0L
not enough matches yet
7.0mixed
88.9%
8W–1L · 57.8% of games
7.5mixed
2W–0L
not enough matches yet
8.0mixed
72.3%
34W–13L · 57.2% of games
8.5mixed
1W–2L
not enough matches yet
9.0mixed
52.9%
9W–8L · 50.5% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 48% of the time
#1 Doubles
48%
172 matches
#2 Doubles
33%
117 matches
#3 Doubles
18%
65 matches
#4 Doubles
1%
5 matches
#3 Singles
0%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Every match is a story with a beginning, a middle and an end, and you are writing it as you go.
Chris Evert