← Search

Jessica Slezak

Omaha, NE
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
58 matches · 27W–31L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Jessica Slezak to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history58 matches
W
2026-06-17 · NE/Obermier/18&Over3.5W · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Deborah McDill
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-2
W
2026-06-03 · NE/Obermier/18&Over3.5W · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Kersten Higgins
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 7-5
L
2026-05-27 · NE/Obermier/18&Over3.5W · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Kersten Higgins
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 2-6
L
2025-09-24 · Gradoville · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Kersten Higgins
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 2-6
L
2025-09-10 · Gradoville · #3 Doubles · 2.5 · with Kelly Mand
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 3-6
L
2025-08-20 · Gradoville · #3 Doubles · 2.5 · with Kelly Mand
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 3-6, 1-0
W
2025-06-25 · NE/Blake/18&Over3.5W · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Elana Harm
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 4-6, 1-0
W
2025-06-04 · NE/Blake/18&Over3.5W · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Elana Harm
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-2
L
2025-05-28 · NE/Blake/18&Over3.5W · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Robyn Kleidosty
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 1-6, 0-1
W
2023-07-23 · Slezak · #1 Doubles · 9.0 · with Scott Slezak mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 1-6, 1-0
W
2023-07-16 · Slezak · #1 Doubles · 9.0 · with Scott Slezak mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 6-2, 1-0
W
2023-06-25 · Slezak · #3 Doubles · 9.0 · with Scott Slezak mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-2, 6-3
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams13 teams · 2020–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level5 levels played
2.5
0W–2L
not enough matches yet
3.0
0W–1L
not enough matches yet
3.5
57.1%
4W–3L · 53.3% of games
4.0
40.6%
13W–19L · 48.4% of games
9.0mixed
62.5%
10W–6L · 48.5% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #3 Doubles, 38% of the time
#3 Doubles
38%
22 matches
#2 Doubles
28%
16 matches
#1 Doubles
24%
14 matches
#2 Singles
9%
5 matches
#1 Singles
2%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Start where you are. Use what you have. Do what you can.
Arthur Ashe