← Search

Elana Harm

Council Bluffs, IA
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
74 matches · 38W–36L · seasons 2020–2026

Captains: add Elana Harm to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history74 matches
W
2026-07-01 · NE/Obermier/18&Over3.5W · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Haley Fischman
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-3
L
2026-06-24 · NE/Obermier/18&Over3.5W · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Kersten Higgins
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 6-4, 0-1
L
2026-06-17 · NE/Obermier/18&Over3.5W · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Rachel Prentiss
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-0, 0-1
W
2026-05-27 · NE/Obermier/18&Over3.5W · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Rachel Prentiss
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-0
L
2025-09-10 · NE/Banks-Thielen/Tri-3.5-4.5W · #3 Doubles · 2.5 · with Amanda Blumkin
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 4-6
W
2025-06-25 · NE/Blake/18&Over3.5W · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Jessica Slezak
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 4-6, 1-0
W
2025-06-04 · NE/Blake/18&Over3.5W · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Jessica Slezak
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-2
L
2025-05-31 · NE/Blake/18&Over3.5W · #1 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 2-6
L
2024-07-26 · Stuva · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Gabriel Pariacote mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
1-6, 6-1, 0-1
W
2024-07-09 · Zalar · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Jordan Leeds
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 7-5
W
2024-06-26 · Zalar · #2 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-3
L
2024-06-10 · Blake · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Kersten Higgins
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 2-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams21 teams · 2020–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level5 levels played
2.5
16.7%
1W–5L · 41.2% of games
3.5
78.8%
26W–7L · 58.1% of games
4.0
0%
0W–13L · 31.9% of games
7.0mixed
100%
5W–0L · 64.5% of games
8.0mixed
26.7%
4W–11L · 46.5% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #3 Doubles, 41% of the time
#3 Doubles
41%
30 matches
#1 Doubles
26%
19 matches
#2 Doubles
24%
18 matches
#1 Singles
5%
4 matches
#2 Singles
4%
3 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Success is a journey, not a destination. The doing is often more important than the outcome.
Arthur Ashe