← Search

Eletise Wolman

PAGO PAGO, AS
3.0C year-end 2024
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
18 matches · 5W–13L · seasons 2020–2024

Captains: add Eletise Wolman to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history18 matches
L
2024-07-30 · BTA-IBM PURPLE · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Ruth Henderson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-7
L
2024-07-23 · BTA-IBM PURPLE · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Kimberly Gerra
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 4-6
L
2024-07-16 · BTA-IBM PURPLE · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Ruth Henderson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 3-6
L
2022-05-17 · BTA PINK · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Jaclyn Swan
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 4-6
W
2022-05-11 · BTA YELLOW · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Ruth Henderson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 4-5
W
2022-05-10 · BTA PINK · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Ruth Henderson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 7-6
W
2022-05-06 · BTA YELLOW · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Pat Burgener
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-2
W
N/A
2022-04-27 · BTA YELLOW · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Pat Burgener
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-0
L
2021-08-25 · CACF PINK · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Jaclyn Swan
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 1-6
L
2021-08-18 · CACF PINK · #1 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 5-7
L
2021-08-11 · CACF PINK · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Jaclyn Swan
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 4-6
L
2021-06-01 · CACF ORANGE · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Kathy Webber
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 2-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams7 teams · 2020–2024
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level2 levels played
3.5
13.3%
2W–13L · 35.8% of games
7.0
3W–0L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 56% of the time
#2 Doubles
56%
10 matches
#1 Doubles
22%
4 matches
#3 Doubles
17%
3 matches
#1 Singles
6%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

What matters isn’t how well you play when you’re playing well. What matters is how well you play when you’re playing badly.
Martina Navratilova