← Search

Anita Taylor

Longmont, CO
4.0A year-end 2025
i
Appeal — granted on request, not computed
234 matches · 144W–90L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Anita Taylor to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history234 matches
W
2026-08-08 · LTA-Q RED · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Samuel Swift mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 6-3
L
2026-08-06 · LTA-Q ORANGE · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Jennifer Ufland
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 6-0, 0-1
W
2026-07-30 · LTA-Q ORANGE · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Jennifer Ufland
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-4
W
2026-07-28 · LTA-Q SILVER · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Christina Finkel
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 7-6, 1-0
L
2026-07-24 · #1 Doubles · with Ari Finkelstein championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 2-6
W
2026-07-14 · LTA-Q RED · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Monica Blanco
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 6-4, 1-0
L
2026-07-12 · LTA-Q RED · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Samuel Swift mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 6-7
L
2026-07-10 · LTA-Q RED · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Michael Bombulie mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-2, 4-6, 0-1
L
2026-07-09 · LTA-Q ORANGE · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Christine Bonthius
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 6-4, 0-1
W
2026-07-02 · LTA-Q ORANGE · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Christine Bonthius
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-2
L
2026-06-30 · LTA-Q RED · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Christina Finkel
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 2-6
W
2026-06-29 · LTA-Q ORANGE · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Jennifer Ufland
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 7-5, 1-0
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams53 teams · 2020–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level9 levels played
2.5
50%
3W–3L · 54.9% of games
3.0
97%
32W–1L · 69% of games
3.5
63.3%
38W–22L · 57.9% of games
4.0
40%
16W–24L · 46.1% of games
6.0mixed
100%
10W–0L · 69.8% of games
6.5mixed
75%
6W–2L · 63% of games
7.0mixed
75%
24W–8L · 61.3% of games
7.5mixed
46.7%
7W–8L · 50.3% of games
8.0mixed
22.2%
2W–7L · 44.2% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 44% of the time
#1 Doubles
44%
103 matches
#2 Doubles
28%
66 matches
#3 Doubles
26%
61 matches
#1 Singles
1%
2 matches
#2 Singles
1%
2 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

The mark of great sportsmen is not how good they are at their best, but how good they are at their worst.
Martina Navratilova