← Search

Meredith McClellan

— year-end
82 matches · 56W–26L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Meredith McClellan to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history82 matches
W
2026-07-24 · FCCC RED · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Whitney Schroeder
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 1-6, 1-0
W
2026-06-12 · FCCC RED · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Whitney Schroeder
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 2-6, 1-0
L
2026-05-26 · CSU GOLD · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Hanna Grow-Morales
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 0-6
W
2026-05-15 · CSU GOLD · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with Whitney Schroeder
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-0
L
2026-04-21 · CSU GOLD · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with Amanda Repert
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 4-6
W
2025-08-24 · CSU WHITE · #3 Doubles · 8.5 · with Tyler Hempstead mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-2, 6-4
L
2025-08-10 · CSU WHITE · #2 Doubles · 8.5 · with Tyler Hempstead mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 4-6, 0-1
L
2025-08-03 · CSU WHITE · #2 Doubles · 8.5 · with Tyler Hempstead mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-6, 0-6, 0-1
W
2025-07-05 · CSU WHITE · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Macy Ricketts
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-2, 1-0
L
2025-06-13 · CSU WHITE · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Whitney Schroeder
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 1-6
W
Andrea Motley / Sarah Davis
2025-05-13 · CSU GOLD · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with Amanda Repert
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 6-2, 1-0
W
2025-04-22 · CSU GOLD · #3 Doubles · 4.5 · with Whitney Schroeder
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 2-6, 1-0
Teams19 teams · 2020–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level6 levels played
3.0
2W–1L
not enough matches yet
3.5
50%
2W–2L · 45.2% of games
4.0
71.9%
41W–16L · 59.4% of games
4.5
71.4%
5W–2L · 47.5% of games
7.5mixed
3W–0L
not enough matches yet
8.5mixed
40%
2W–3L · 52.6% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 60% of the time
#1 Doubles
60%
49 matches
#2 Doubles
28%
23 matches
#1 Singles
5%
4 matches
#2 Singles
4%
3 matches
#3 Doubles
4%
3 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

The mark of great sportsmen is not how good they are at their best, but how good they are at their worst.
Martina Navratilova