← Search

Michael Feldtmose

Annapolis, MD
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
59 matches · 33W–26L · seasons 2022–2026

Captains: add Michael Feldtmose to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history59 matches
W
2026-07-25 · Feldtmose/Appel · #1 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 5-7, 1-0
L
2026-07-13 · Feldtmose/Appel · #1 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 0-6
W
2026-07-12 · Feldtmose/Appel · #1 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-2
W
2026-07-08 · Feldtmose/Appel · #1 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 4-6, 1-0
W
2026-06-25 · Feldtmose/Appel · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Russell Hester
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-2
W
2026-06-18 · Feldtmose/Appel · #1 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-1
W
Kelly Kennedy / George Sybert
2025-12-14 · McVeigh · #2 Doubles · 6.5 · with Heather Nesti mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 6-1
L
2025-12-06 · McVeigh · #2 Doubles · 6.5 · with Julie Fisher mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-1, 3-6, 0-1
L
2025-11-23 · The Sinners · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Jordan Weinshank
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 4-6
W
2025-11-18 · McVeigh · #3 Doubles · 6.5 · with Heather Nesti mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 7-6
L
2025-11-16 · McVeigh · #2 Doubles · 6.5 · with Erin McVeigh mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
5-7, 3-6
L
Mike Kelly / Mark Flanegan
2025-11-14 · The Sinners · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Umer Farooq
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 0-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams18 teams · 2022–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level7 levels played
3.5
63.3%
19W–11L · 55.1% of games
4.0
1W–1L
not enough matches yet
6.5
25%
1W–3L · 32.3% of games
3.0mixed
75%
3W–1L · 58.7% of games
3.5mixed
2W–0L
not enough matches yet
6.5mixed
50%
4W–4L · 55% of games
7.0mixed
33.3%
3W–6L · 43.4% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 24% of the time
#1 Doubles
24%
14 matches
#2 Singles
24%
14 matches
#1 Singles
19%
11 matches
#2 Doubles
19%
11 matches
#3 Doubles
14%
8 matches
#3 Singles
2%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Experience is a big word. I think it comes with time, and I have that.
Serena Williams