← Search

Umer Farooq

Ellicott City, MD
3.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
64 matches · 30W–34L · seasons 2023–2026

Captains: add Umer Farooq to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history64 matches
L
2026-09-12 · Farooq · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Aleksey Pletnev
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-7, 0-1
W
2026-09-09 · MOORE - Ballerz · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Zhenliang Gao
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 6-4
W
2026-09-08 · MOORE - Ballerz · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Faisal Hussain
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 6-4
W
2026-09-03 · Farooq · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Frank Burnett
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 6-3, 1-0
L
2026-08-16 · MOORE - Ballerz · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Faisal Hussain
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 6-4, 0-1
L
2026-08-15 · Farooq · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Russell Hester
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 4-6
W
2026-08-08 · MOORE - Ballerz · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Zhenliang Gao
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-2
L
2026-07-27 · MOORE - Ballerz · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Zhenliang Gao
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-2, 0-1
W
N/A
2026-03-29 · Farooq · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Sherry Madden mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-0, 6-0
W
2026-03-10 · Farooq · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Sherry Madden mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-7, 6-4, 1-0
W
2026-02-23 · Farooq · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Sherry Madden mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-1, 6-4
L
2026-02-08 · Farooq · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Amy Dawson mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-7, 3-5
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams21 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level9 levels played
3.0
50%
15W–15L · 52.2% of games
3.5
28.6%
2W–5L · 36.7% of games
6.5
20%
1W–4L · 38.3% of games
3.0mixed
1W–0L
not enough matches yet
3.5mixed
1W–2L
not enough matches yet
5.5mixed
75%
3W–1L · 63.9% of games
6.0mixed
40%
2W–3L · 43.2% of games
6.5mixed
25%
1W–3L · 44.4% of games
7.0mixed
80%
4W–1L · 64.1% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #3 Doubles, 39% of the time
#3 Doubles
39%
25 matches
#1 Doubles
36%
23 matches
#2 Doubles
17%
11 matches
#2 Singles
5%
3 matches
#3 Singles
3%
2 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

I really think a champion is defined not by their wins but by how they can recover when they fall.
Serena Williams