← Search

Kimberly Walko

Pasadena, MD
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
324 matches · 160W–164L · seasons 2021–2026

Captains: add Kimberly Walko to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history324 matches
L
2026-09-12 · Quinlan - Aperol Spritzes and Fritzes · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Andrew Aylward mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
5-7, 6-4, 0-1
L
2026-09-12 · Moreland · #3 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 2-6
L
2026-09-01 · Quinlan - Aperol Spritzes and Fritzes · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Kelvin Commey mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 4-6
L
2026-08-30 · Ball Strikers Tri · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Tom Erdely mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
1-6, 0-6
W
2026-08-15 · Lady Strikers Tri · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Casey Royster
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 4-6, 1-0
L
2026-08-09 · Lady Strikers Tri · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Mary Li
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 4-6
W
2026-08-04 · Ball Strikers 8.0 · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Mike Kelly mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 6-4, 1-0
L
2026-07-27 · Slice Girls · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Dale Clark
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 3-6
L
2026-07-26 · Ball Strikers 8.0 · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Jack Lavinder mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 2-6
L
2026-07-26 · Slice Girls · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Laura Laabs
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 4-6, 0-1
W
2026-07-22 · Slice Girls · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Dale Clark
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 3-6, 1-0
L
2026-07-07 · Slice Girls · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Kim Neiss
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 3-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams77 teams · 2020–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level11 levels played
3.0
70.8%
17W–7L · 58.4% of games
3.5
57.9%
77W–56L · 51.3% of games
4.0
30%
9W–21L · 41.5% of games
6.5
50%
9W–9L · 55.7% of games
7.5
53.8%
7W–6L · 43.6% of games
3.5mixed
53.8%
7W–6L · 48.7% of games
6.0mixed
72.7%
8W–3L · 56.9% of games
6.5mixed
87.5%
7W–1L · 62.1% of games
7.0mixed
29.7%
11W–26L · 44.8% of games
7.5mixed
23.1%
3W–10L · 43.9% of games
8.0mixed
28.6%
4W–10L · 42% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 34% of the time
#2 Doubles
34%
109 matches
#3 Doubles
28%
90 matches
#1 Doubles
17%
55 matches
#2 Singles
9%
30 matches
#1 Singles
9%
28 matches
#3 Singles
4%
12 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

I really think a champion is defined not by their wins but by how they can recover when they fall.
Serena Williams