← Search

Janet Gilliam

Charlotte, NC
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
104 matches · 47W–57L · seasons 2021–2026

Captains: add Janet Gilliam to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history104 matches
W
2026-09-11 · JCook/Weaver (PCC) · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Jennie Cook
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-0
W
2026-09-04 · JCook/Weaver (PCC) · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Jennie Cook
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-1
L
Deana Deep / Katie Nelson
2026-08-28 · TBlankenship (PCC) · #2 Doubles · 6.5 · with Monica Smith
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 2-6
L
2026-08-24 · SConnor (PCC) · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Lisa Duggins
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 2-6, 0-1
W
2026-08-21 · TBlankenship (PCC) · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Lacey Johnson Boatman
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-1
L
2026-08-17 · SConnor (PCC) · #2 Doubles · 6.5 · with Mimi Carbone
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 3-6
W
2026-08-07 · JCook/Weaver (PCC) · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Brooke Hassell
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 7-6
L
2026-08-03 · SConnor (PCC) · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Lisa Duggins
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 4-6
L
2026-07-31 · WVineyard/JCook (PCC) · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Kathleen Carpenter
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 5-7
L
2026-07-03 · WVineyard/JCook (PCC) · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Brooke Hassell
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 7-5, 0-1
L
2026-06-12 · WVineyard/JCook (PCC) · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Christine Leavitt
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 0-6
L
2026-05-01 · JCook/Weaver (PCC) · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Jennie Cook
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 1-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams33 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level5 levels played
3.0
0W–3L
not enough matches yet
3.5
86.4%
19W–3L · 60.2% of games
4.0
14.3%
5W–30L · 34.1% of games
6.5
56.2%
9W–7L · 54.9% of games
7.5
48.1%
13W–14L · 48.5% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 67% of the time
#1 Doubles
67%
70 matches
#2 Doubles
24%
25 matches
#3 Doubles
9%
9 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

I really think a champion is defined not by their wins but by how they can recover when they fall.
Serena Williams