← Search

Hunter Todd

Jackson, TN
4.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
33 matches · 24W–9L · seasons 2024–2026

Captains: add Hunter Todd to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history33 matches
W
2026-08-30 · Malone/Memphis · #3 Doubles · 8.5 · with Freddy Ojeda
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 7-5
W
2026-08-29 · Malone/Memphis · #2 Doubles · 8.5 · with Caden LeBlanc
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-1
L
2026-08-19 · Malone/Memphis · #1 Doubles · 8.5 · with Jon Bell
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 4-6, 1-0
W
2026-08-09 · Malone/Memphis · #1 Doubles · 8.5 · with Jon Bell
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-1
W
2026-05-07 · Todd/Memphis · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with John Gardner
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-1
L
2026-04-28 · Todd/Memphis · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Morgan Talley
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 4-6
L
2026-04-11 · Todd/Memphis · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Asher Roddy
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 7-6, 0-1
L
2026-04-11 · Todd/Memphis · #1 Singles · 4.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 3-6, 0-1
W
2026-04-03 · Todd/Memphis · #3 Doubles · 4.5 · with Asher Roddy
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-1
L
2025-11-18 · Boyd/Memphis · #1 Singles · 4.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 4-6
W
2025-10-30 · Boyd/Memphis · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Jesse Boyd
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 7-6, 1-0
W
2025-10-14 · Boyd/Memphis · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Jesse Boyd
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 2-6, 1-0
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams21 teams · 2021–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level3 levels played
4.0
90.9%
10W–1L · 68.3% of games
4.5
61.1%
11W–7L · 52.5% of games
8.5
75%
3W–1L · 61.2% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Singles, 42% of the time
#1 Singles
42%
14 matches
#1 Doubles
24%
8 matches
#3 Doubles
15%
5 matches
#2 Doubles
9%
3 matches
#2 Singles
9%
3 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Tennis is mostly mental. You win or lose the match before you even go out there.
Venus Williams