← Search

Bill Whitmire

Collierville, TN
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
25 matches · 13W–12L · seasons 2022–2026

Captains: add Bill Whitmire to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history25 matches
L
2026-08-29 · Melton/Memphis · #2 Doubles · 8.5 · with Matthew Keeler
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 1-6
L
2026-07-22 · Richards/Memphis · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Nelli Golmeeva mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
1-6, 2-6
L
2026-07-15 · Hollis/Memphis · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Anna Whitmire mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-6, 3-6, 0-1
W
2026-06-28 · Richards/Memphis · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Latasha Echols mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-1, 7-5
W
2026-06-27 · Hollis/Memphis · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Lynn Davis mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-0, 6-2
L
John Gardner / Hunter Todd
2026-05-07 · Melton/Memphis · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with Scott Melton
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 1-6
W
2026-04-25 · Philips/Memphis · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Darshan Sampat
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-1
L
John Gardner / Tristan Jackson
2025-12-06 · Hecht/Memphis · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with David Collins
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 2-6
L
Jerry Vaughn / David Johnson
2025-09-20 · Bartley/Memphis · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Terry Bartley
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 1-6
W
2025-08-24 · Melton/Memphis · #1 Doubles · 8.5 · with Scott Melton
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 6-1, 1-0
W
2024-12-15 · Hoehn/Memphis · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Matthew Gregg
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 7-6
W
2024-10-20 · Hoehn/Memphis · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Matthew Gregg
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-3, 1-0
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams43 teams · 2021–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level7 levels played
4.0
100%
4W–0L · 59.3% of games
4.5
25%
1W–3L · 42% of games
7.5
1W–2L
not enough matches yet
8.5
50%
2W–2L · 52.1% of games
4.0mixed
42.9%
3W–4L · 45% of games
4.5mixed
1W–1L
not enough matches yet
8.0mixed
1W–0L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 36% of the time
#2 Doubles
36%
9 matches
#1 Doubles
32%
8 matches
#3 Doubles
28%
7 matches
#1 Mixed Doubles
4%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Experience is a big word. I think it comes with time, and I have that.
Serena Williams