← Search

Matthew Keeler

— year-end
56 matches · 40W–16L · seasons 2024–2026

Captains: add Matthew Keeler to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history56 matches
W
2026-09-01 · Melton/Memphis · #2 Doubles · 8.5 · with Luke Spencer
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 0-6, 1-0
L
2026-08-29 · Melton/Memphis · #2 Doubles · 8.5 · with Bill Whitmire
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 1-6
L
2026-07-29 · McCalla/Memphis · #3 Doubles · 4.5 · with Ruthie Turpin mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
0-1
W
2026-06-27 · McCalla/Memphis · #3 Doubles · 4.5 · with Shannon McCalla mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 6-2, 1-0
L
2026-05-07 · Melton/Memphis · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Jon Nestler
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 7-6, 0-1
W
2026-05-01 · Melton/Memphis · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Jesse Boyd
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-2
W
2026-04-11 · Melton/Memphis · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Jay Robillard
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-7, 1-0
W
2026-04-03 · Melton/Memphis · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with Gregory Szatkowski
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-3
L
2025-11-23 · Moore/Memphis · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Caden LeBlanc
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 3-6, 0-1
L
2025-11-19 · Robillard/Memphis · #1 Singles · 4.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 0-6
L
2025-11-18 · Robillard/Memphis · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with Gregory Szatkowski
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 4-6
W
2025-11-01 · Robillard/Memphis · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Gregory Szatkowski
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 6-3, 1-0
Teams24 teams · 2024–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level8 levels played
3.0
1W–0L
not enough matches yet
3.5
3W–0L
not enough matches yet
4.0
78.6%
11W–3L · 58% of games
4.5
69.2%
9W–4L · 52.1% of games
7.5
60%
6W–4L · 55.8% of games
8.5
1W–2L
not enough matches yet
4.0mixed
83.3%
5W–1L · 59.7% of games
4.5mixed
60%
3W–2L · 54.8% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 41% of the time
#1 Doubles
41%
23 matches
#3 Doubles
34%
19 matches
#2 Doubles
18%
10 matches
#2 Singles
5%
3 matches
#1 Singles
2%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You have to take the initiative and play your game. Confidence is just believing you can do it.
Chris Evert