← Search

Marybeth Snodgrass

— year-end
64 matches · 35W–29L · seasons 2024–2026

Captains: add Marybeth Snodgrass to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history64 matches
L
Stephanie Feyes / Sarah Green
2026-08-30 · Csernovicz/Nashville · #1 Doubles · 8.5 · with Taylor Shelton
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 2-6
W
2026-08-09 · Csernovicz/Nashville · #2 Doubles · 8.5 · with Taylor Shelton
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-3
W
Sarah Green / Carrie Jones
2026-07-26 · Csernovicz/Nashville · #1 Doubles · 8.5 · with Rachel Simon
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 7-6
W
2026-07-12 · Sharpe/Nashville · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Stephan Pierenkemper mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-5, 6-3
L
2026-06-29 · McDonald/Nashville · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Cindy Mccullough
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 3-6
W
2026-06-23 · McDonald/Nashville · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Jamie Weiss
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-3, 1-0
L
Josh Gregory / Alise Gregory
2026-06-21 · Sharpe/Nashville · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Zack Gonzalez mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 7-6, 1-0
L
2026-06-02 · McDonald/Nashville · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Jamie Weiss
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 1-6
W
2026-06-01 · McDonald/Nashville · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Cindy Mccullough
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-1
W
2026-04-29 · Hermann/Nashville · #1 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 4-6, 1-0
L
2026-04-15 · Hermann/Nashville · #2 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 2-6, 0-1
L
2026-04-08 · Hermann/Nashville · #1 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 2-6
Teams48 teams · 2021–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level5 levels played
4.0
73.7%
14W–5L · 59.1% of games
4.5
43.5%
10W–13L · 42.6% of games
7.5
50%
2W–2L · 53.1% of games
8.5
36.4%
4W–7L · 48.6% of games
4.0mixed
71.4%
5W–2L · 54.5% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 30% of the time
#1 Doubles
30%
19 matches
#1 Singles
27%
17 matches
#2 Doubles
20%
13 matches
#3 Doubles
14%
9 matches
#2 Singles
9%
6 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

The mark of great sportsmen is not how good they are at their best, but how good they are at their worst.
Martina Navratilova