← Search

Stephanie Feyes

— year-end
104 matches · 83W–21L · seasons 2024–2026

Captains: add Stephanie Feyes to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history104 matches
W
2026-09-13 · Green/Nashville · #1 Doubles · 8.5 · with Carrie Jones
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-1
W
2026-08-31 · PM - Csernovicz/Nashville · #3 Doubles · 8.5 · with Ann Page
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-3
W
2026-08-30 · Green/Nashville · #1 Doubles · 8.5 · with Sarah Green
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-2
L
2026-08-24 · PM - Csernovicz/Nashville · #1 Doubles · 8.5 · with Kathleen Carbonari
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-2, 0-1
L
2026-08-16 · Green/Nashville · #2 Doubles · 8.5 · with Sharling Grummon
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 3-6
L
2026-08-03 · PM - Csernovicz/Nashville · #2 Doubles · 8.5 · with Kathleen Carbonari
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 7-6, 0-1
W
2026-08-02 · Green/Nashville · #2 Doubles · 8.5 · with Aya Melhem
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-4
W
2026-07-08 · Burnstein/Nashville · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Stacey Andrews
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-1
W
2026-07-06 · Burnstein/Nashville · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Katie Feyes
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 7-5
W
2026-06-17 · Burnstein/Nashville · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Katie Feyes
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-2
L
2026-06-09 · Burnstein/Nashville · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Monica Nelson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 7-5, 0-1
W
2026-06-01 · Burnstein/Nashville · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Katie Feyes
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-2
Teams90 teams · 2021–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level7 levels played
3.5
3W–0L
not enough matches yet
4.0
95.8%
46W–2L · 69.8% of games
4.5
47.4%
9W–10L · 51.9% of games
7.5
1W–0L
not enough matches yet
8.5
56.2%
9W–7L · 58.6% of games
4.0mixed
93.3%
14W–1L · 62.5% of games
4.5mixed
1W–1L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 48% of the time
#1 Doubles
48%
50 matches
#2 Doubles
29%
30 matches
#3 Doubles
19%
20 matches
#4 Doubles
3%
3 matches
#1 Singles
1%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Every match is a story with a beginning, a middle and an end, and you are writing it as you go.
Chris Evert