← Search

Jamie Weiss

Nashville, TN
4.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
54 matches · 32W–22L · seasons 2022–2026

Captains: add Jamie Weiss to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history54 matches
W
2026-08-09 · Csernovicz/Nashville · #1 Doubles · 8.5 · with Heather Laney
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-2
W
2026-06-23 · McDonald/Nashville · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Marybeth Snodgrass
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-3, 1-0
L
2026-06-02 · McDonald/Nashville · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Marybeth Snodgrass
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 1-6
W
2025-11-24 · Snodgrass/Nashville · #1 Singles · 4.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-0
W
2025-09-29 · Snodgrass/Nashville · #1 Singles · 4.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-3
L
2025-09-27 · Csernovicz/Nashville · #2 Doubles · 8.5 · with Marybeth Snodgrass
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 3-6
W
2025-09-20 · Csernovicz/Nashville · #3 Doubles · 8.5 · with Laura Wilson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 7-5
L
2025-08-16 · Csernovicz/Nashville · #2 Doubles · 8.5 · with Shannon Smith
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 6-7, 0-1
W
2025-07-08 · McDonald/Nashville · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Veronica Allen
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 3-6, 1-0
L
2025-06-25 · Faldetta/Nashville · #3 Doubles · 4.5 · with John Faldetta mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
1-6, 3-6
W
2025-06-10 · McDonald/Nashville · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Ann Marie Dixon
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-2, 1-0
L
2025-05-27 · McDonald/Nashville · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Veronica Allen
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-7
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams21 teams · 2022–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level6 levels played
3.5
33.3%
2W–4L · 40% of games
4.0
2W–1L
not enough matches yet
4.5
70.8%
17W–7L · 62.8% of games
8.5
50%
2W–2L · 52.1% of games
4.5mixed
0W–1L
not enough matches yet
8.0mixed
53.3%
8W–7L · 55% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 30% of the time
#1 Doubles
30%
16 matches
#1 Singles
22%
12 matches
#2 Doubles
22%
12 matches
#2 Singles
15%
8 matches
#3 Doubles
11%
6 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You can get through anything if you keep going one point at a time.
Arthur Ashe